Lecture One
DEAD OF NIGHT

1945
Earilng Studios

Problems of Culture and interpretation of materials from other cultures.

Every culture has its own set of “rules” or “beliefs” or “ethos”. While it is perfectly clear that all individuals in a culture do not act exactly the same way, there are general patterns that can be, and have been seen by social scientists – especially cultural anthropologists.

There is an additional problem involved in language, There are many aspects to language than just simple “this word refers to that”

Consider problems of “register”

I got a letter today
I received an epistle.

He is an American Indian
He is an Native American

I am going to Taiwan
I am going to Formosa

The differences do not refer to different things, just perhaps attitudes towards things, speakers – hearer context relationships all of which may vary from culture to culture.

Shift in dialect. What does Brooklynese mean in a film?

What dialect in German would Eliza Doolittle speak (big problem in Norwegian translation as to which dialect is the prestige dialect?

Southern dialect can sound either very “refined” when talking about mint juleps and very dangerous when used as “redneck” speech. How much of this shows us in subtitles?

A question of “emics and etics”.

Kenneth Pile developed the idea based on linguistics that an event and its perception can be rather different when different cultures see the same thing.

So one of the problems we have is that any work of art is an “etic” – the thing itself while each interpretation is a different emic. We can find the same thing even between 2 people with the same event. Clyde Kluckhohn (1905-1960) a famous anthropologists of the 1930s, 40s and 50’s once said

In some ways all men are like all other men (humanity)
In some ways all men are like some other men (cultural)
In some ways all men are like no other men (individual)

So there will always be the possibility of interpreting a work of art from the standpoint of the culture that made it and also from the culture of a viewer not from that society. Analysis generally attempts to explain why the viewer made the interpretation it did using rules from the person’s own culture and personal experience.

So when Bride of Frankenstein was released in 1935 it had a number of problems with censorship. Some of it dealt with its religious statements about “god” and the creation of life – which had also plagued the earlier film Frankenstein. Some objections were raised to Else Lanchester’s low cut gown at the start of the Bride of Frankenstein Various states demanded specific cuts. Some European countries banned the Bride altogether. Even Japan got into the act and was upset by certain scenes – but for a non Christian country and one which had little problem with nudity the reason may come as a surprise – they were upset by the improper handling of the miniature King created by Pretorious!

So we can say that different cultures will have different aesthetics and that even the same country may have different aesthetics in the courses of its history. Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring, for example, produced a near riot when it was first performed in 1913, but is not seen as the slightest bit Avant-garde today.

THE DEFINITION OF “HORROR” AND ITS CROSS CULTURAL PROBLEMS

Horror films are difficult to define. Horror films reflect fears of many different things in different cultures and at different times. Films are chosen to reflect similarities and differences between what is horrific in different cultures at different times.

Horror films try to arouse negative emotional reaction from viewers by dealing with audience's primal fears. People like Edgar Allan Poe, Bram Stoker, and Mary Shelley inspired early horror films. Horror films have been popular from early time in films and try to produce scenes that wouldscare or startle the viewer. Although weird, macabre and/or supernatural are often found in horror films sucj elements may also be found in fantasy, supernatural fiction and thriller genres.

The term "horror" as used to describe a film genre was not used until the 1930s. This was the time when Universal Pictures released Dracula (1931) and Frankenstein (1931), Hollywood dramas often used horror themes.

Horror films often attempt to realize the viewers' nightmares, fears, revulsions and terror of the unknown. They may or may not contain supernatual elements. Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho widely regarded as a horror film has no supernatural elements.

SUBTEXTS – eruption of the repressed?

SUBTEXT PROBLEMS

Is it possible to define a genre by the subtext?
Do horror films represent something repressed? Does it deal with “monsters from the id”? (in which case is If so, do different cultures at different times repress different things? If so what is happening?
America – sex? Now fear of the body (AIDS? Death by dismemberment, cannibalism, gross out humor - what?
Comedy and horror often bring up "unmentionable things" - things which people may be tense about discussing openly.
Do all of these potential “grounds for classifying” change over time and space? Problems of analysis

Film 1 text

Film 2 text

Film 3 text

|
|
V

|
|
V

|
|
V

Film 1 subtext

Film 2 subtext

Film 3 subtext

\                                                                                                                 |                                                                                                               /
  \                                                                                                               |                                                                                                            /
    \                                                                                                             |                                                                                                          /
      \                                                                                                           |                                                                                                        /

                                                                                        Abstraction and analysis of Genre

What are the narrative elements of horror stories? (e.g. monsters, transformations etc,)

What are the filmic elements used in horror films? (e.g. showing parts of the creature to imply the whole, use of shadows, reflections, dark and light, odd camera angles (Dutch angle shots) close-ups blocking peripheral view allowing for the sudden appearances of things, cross cutting to lengthed time, etc.)

Certainly one of the main aspects of a horror film is th hope that it will generate a feeling of fear. Just what does that may vary dreamatically in the films. But the nature of the fear producing device can be considered "data" and different genres can approach the same "data" or "subject matter" differently. In a similar way college deartments used to be based on theoretical approaches not data per se, The result was "religion" (data or subject matter) could be approached by different departments with different theoretical approaches. One could find "The Philosophy of Religion", "The Sociology of Religion", "The Anthropology of Religion" all of which apprached the same subject matter with different theoretical approaches.Later the uiversities began to develop departments based on data (Women's Studies, Native American Studies, Queer Studies, American Studies and so on),. So a fanrasy film would approach the supernatural in a different way than a horror film might.

The implications of this are that the texts, subtexts and film technicques involved with each genre will be different. In the came of mixed genre films, some genres will be more compatable with some other genres than they might be with still other genres. Science fiction musicals are close to non existent for example.

The process of determining the subtext is through hermeneutics:

Text=>hermeneutics=> subtext

Hermeneutics (the breaking of a textual code) : symbols, metaphors (includes metonymy and synecdoche)

SERIES SEQUELS AND PORTAMNEAU (ANTHOLOGY) FILMS

Portmanteau (from a bag that splits into two compartments. Portmanteau morpheme carries many meanings (-s is singular third person active indicative) or “anthology” film. Several films like this since then include films like Black Sabbath, Creepshow, Dr. Terrors House of Terrors, The House that Dripped Blood etc. where some sort of narrator links the stories together.

Tales of Manhattan 1942 is not so much an anthology film as a film which follows the movement of a “cursed” coat.

Compare Halloween which was to be a series of films in which each film was set on Halloween (see Season of the Witch)

This film has several stories written by different writers and directed by different directors: Alberto Cavalcanti, Charles Crichton, Basil Dearden and Robert Hamer.

Free floating supernatural forces are difficult to deal with on film which is so specifically a visual medium

The film contains 5 stories (race car, party, mirror, golf, ventriloquist and they are unlike most anthology films linked by a 6th story rather than a narrative.

Horror and Humor

Breaks tension. Unrelieved tension looses tension.

Is there a difference between subtext of horror and humor in supernatural films

(Don’t be afraid of anti-rational? Anti rational is funny?)

Ealing Studios is a Brttish Studio located in what was suburb of London called Ealing The studio starts about 1930. The last film with the Ealing logo was 1959 one of the major producers involved with the studio was Sir Michael Balcon (1886-1977). His first production was a thriller called The Gaunt Stranger in 1938. Alec Guiness was the actor most associated with the studio. In its 29 year period it produced some of the most famous British films: Passport to Pimlico, Kind Hearts and Coronets, Whisky Galore (Tight Little Island), The Lavender Hill Mob, Lady Killers; It Always Rains on Sunday, Scot of the Antarctic, The Cruel Sea and Dead of Night

The war was far more devastating in Britain than the US since the country was bombed regularly and through the war the theaters continued to perform and films continued to be made.

The first Ealing film after the war without a war motif was Dead of Night. It is also the first “Portmanteau” film they made in which several directors worked on different segments

Alberto Cavalcanti (Brazilian) (segments "Christmas Party" and "The Ventriloquist's Dummy") (as Cavalcanti) (also did The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickelby and did sound on Night Mail documentary)

Charles Crichton (segment "Golfing Story")

Basil Dearden (segments "Hearse Driver" and "Linking Narrative") (Also did Green Man and Victim)

Robert Hamer (segment "The Haunted Mirror") Similarly the different stories are by 5 different writers: H.G. Wells, E.F. Benson, John Baines, Angus MacPhail, T.E.B. Clarke

After the Film

What supernatural elements are in each story:

Race car driver: premonition
Party: Ghost
Golf: Ghost
Ventriloquist: possession

Dreamer: premonition.

What can you say about the rational/ antirational approach of the film? What role does the psychiatrist play? How is his story relevant?

What boundry is crossed? Reality vs supernatural.

Race car opposite of many films where past intrudes. Here future intrudes

Ghost: living vs. dead

Mirror: body/soul - future/present

Ghost living/dead

Dummy: animate/inanimate – control/non-control

Breaking or crossing boundries is sometimes called transgressive, which is basically to put a negative spin on the boundry crossing although it need not be so.

In most anthology films no connection between each story is bounded in Dead of Night the boundries are blurred because the overriding connective story

It is possible to examine all 6 stories and arrove at some conclusion about the film itself, in the same way that a set of films from the genre can be analyzed by lookng at several films. The stories deal with possession which involve loss of control. Premonitions imply the inevitability of future events. Even in the "Christmas Party" sequence, the ghost is from a murder in the past which can not be prevented.

This certainly inicates a loss of control which is reflected in a rather fatalistic way (much as in noir) in which free will is lost to determinism. It is perhaps not unreasonable to see WWII as something which destroyed any feelings about free will. Loss of free will (and hence of control) implies the breakdown of structure and something akin to anarchy sinice there is no control on how things happen.