Notes for the Fourth Lecture.
DEVELOPMENT OF GENRES AND EPIC FILMS
Intolerance (1916) D.W. Griffith
By the twenties, the genres of film had basically been established. The only major category missing had been the MUSICAL since this was in a sense not possible without sound although The Student Prince (1927) - a musical had been released as a silent. This was done through the use of the orchestral or piano scores
Griffiths films had many innovations including:
Two Italian films appeared that would have an enormous influence of Griffith, Quo Vadis? (2 hours) (1913) Enrico Guazzotti and Cabiria (1913) (2 hours 28 minutes) Giovanni Pastrone.Both were long historical epic films - both 9 reelers
Both were big success in the US and played only in legitimate theaters, not nickelodeons,
Griffith saw both and was impressed with the crowd scenes elaborate sets and camera movement. He was also impressed with the idea of showing films in more luxurious theaters.
The "Strong man" character in Cabiria went to a strong man - along shoreman - named Bartolomeo Pagano who played a character with the same name in 25 more films and adapted it as his own "Stage" name and legally changed his name to Maciste. (Johnny Weismuller, one of the more famous Tarzans used to sign his autograph as "Tarzan") In the 1950’s the character’s name was revitalized in the spate of classic Greek and Roman film sparked by the success of Steve Reeves in Hercules. This time the role was assayed by Brooklyn born body builder Mark Forrest. Both Pagano and Forest were in their day the highest paid stars around.
One argument has been made that Griffith made Intolerance as a follow-up to Birth of a Nation the way Jonathan Demme made Philadelphia after the heavy criticism of Silnce of the Lambs which the gay and(perhaps) transgenderred communitnd offensive,
One of the major developments here as in Russian films is "montage" - basically a kind of relationship between two or more shots in a symbolic way. It is a kind of symbolism:
SYMBOLISM and CODES and CIPHERS:
There are several terms which are close in meaning, REMEMBER THE IDEA OF DEFINITION - DO WE AGREE ON WHAT WE ARE TAALKING ABOUT:
Symbols and Signs.
Codes and ciphers are closely related in people’s minds:
Ciphers are letter substitutions. Ciphers are usually broken by letter counts - the most common occurring letters ETAIN in English other languages different, However you need a substantial text to work with The argument that HALis a cipher for IBM is possible but not really demonstrable. Ciphers can be very complex in terms of nul letters ets,
CODES are word substitutions - Navajo Code talkers used coded Navaho,
>
The code was extremely complex and had to be fully memorized by each code talker. It consisted of 211 Navajo words that were then given military meaning. For example, "fighter plane" became "hummingbird" in Navajo), and "submarine" became "iron fish" in Navajo.
FILM BORROWS FROM OTHER MEDIA e.g. theater and literature. Literature supplies "figures of speech".Some examples are: