LECTURE TWO

SOME TERMS

Movement: Camera:

Superimposition: film is exposed and run back a short distance, then re-exposed with some change in what is being photographed. For a short while the unchanged and changed aspects appear simultaneously (two images appear on top of one another).

Montage: In Russian editing, the bringing together of shots to give additional meaning to the film Historically:

Zootrope: Round box like object with slits in the side. A paper with several images goes inside and when the box is spun on a spindle, the images viewed through the slits appear to move.

Muybridge: Race horse problem: Are all four legs off the ground at once. Set of serial photos which are precursors to film

EARLY FILMS

The Great Train Robbery on the other hand emphasizes realism not "film tricks. These two appraoches develop into two different approaches - a formalist one, where emphasis is more on making people aware of the film and its structure, as opposed to realism which stress the content of the film in the hopes that viewers will basically feel they are looking at a real event through a window (almost). Realism is ofetn assisted by such techniques as long shots. Think about the shot where the passengers are made to get off the train and have their valuables taken from them.

The final scene of the man pointing his pistol at the camera (audience) and firing is one of the first close-ups. It was so impressive to audiences the projectionists often showed it before the film and after as well!

An important part deals with the connection between shots. Shots are like words, editing is like grammar. An important aspect of linking shots is called "montage" which has several meanings. In Russian editing it means juxtaposing shots so that an additional meaning can be seen. It is a kind of "The sum is greater than the whole of its parts". Examples were shown from Stachka (Strike) (1925) (sergei Eisenstein, director); Apocalypse Now (1979) (Francis Ford Coppola, director) and Bowling for Columbine (2002) (Michael Moore. director). In one theory of aesthetics proposed by the Prague School of linguistics, the artistic use of languages differs from its normal use in that it systematically builds and breaks patters in order to create a dynamic tension.

While the Prague school was interested largely in language, the idea has wider application. It has been applied for example to music and here we will try to apply it to the art of film. In order to do this we need to define domains which have variables within them, and which can not co-occur, while the domains themselves can. For example, a shot may be a close-up or a medium or long shot but it can not be all of them at once. Similarly a shot may have deep focus or not, but it can not have both at the same time. However, one can have any kind of distance with any kind of focus. The term “domain” is used here to refer to the collection of things which contains a set of variables which can not co occur with one another, while the domains can co occur. Last time we discussed the kinds of “domains” in which variation can take place as regards film. Some of the things we discussed were:

Photography:

Composition in the frame:
composing he shot. How is the area filled? Where are people placed in the frame. Balance and symmetry. Camera angles. Where is the camera placed relative to the subjects?

Lighting

lighting the shot
How is lighting done. Very complex – generally the “common” unmarked form is three point – main fill in and back. Lights are placed also at different heights for different effects. More on this when we talk about lighting

Color

Movement

1. By the camera
(panning, zooming, dolly shots)

2. By the performers
how do people enter and leave the frame? How is the camera placed.

Exposure

Quality of the media (film- with all the variations of speed and pushing, video tape)
Lenses (telephoto, wide angle etc.)

Editing

Rhythm (one serious problem with pan and scan is it loses the rhythm of the film)
Parallel cutting
Form cuts
Transitions: dissolves, fades etc. wipes
Sound

Sound within the film is going to constitute a domain which we have not yet visited. It has many variables in terms of volume, on or off screen, diegetic or not and so on). In regards to the latter, background music (unheard by the characters in the film) is a non-diagetic sound which needs considering.

Sets:

What kind of sets are there – are they realistic or not? Can you place them as to place and time?

Costumes and make-up:

Are these realistic or not? Expressionistis?

Symbolism –semiotics – study of signs

”Signs” is a general technical term for things with reference, They may be symbols, icons of indices (singular = index). An index is like a fever – a sign of an illness. An icon has some real world connections between the symbol and its referent, A symbol has an arbitrary (or somewhat arbitrary) reference. The foot print of a dog is an icon, the word dog is a symbol. Burying a body so it faces west is rather symbolic but the connection between the west as the setting place for the celestial bodies makes it an obvious (but not necessary) choice.

Motifs, tropes etc.

Ir is possible to hold at some level all of the other aspects of film making may have symbolic aspects to them.

IT IS IMPORTANT to know the meaning of something used as a symbol within that culture. What does it mean? How is it related to other works of art? What is its referent in general within the culture? (reindeer and Santa Clause)

A general education should make students familiar with many of he symbols found in art.

We try to look at all of these to see how they impact on the story telling aspect of the film.

SUNRISE

1927

F.W. Murnau

(actually family name is Plumpe. Murnau is the name of a famous Bavarian artists colony known as Die Blaue Reiter (the Blue Riders) Group BEFORE THE FILM

Feridrich Wilhelm Murnau

Born in Germany 1888 (Bielefeld), Died 1931 in a road accident

Murnau had made a number of well received films in Germany before being asked to come to the US by Fox to make Sunrise. .These included especially Der Letzte Mann and Nosferatu

Sunrise holds an important place in film history. It is the first film to mediate between American melodrama and German expressionism.

Dialectics.

Originally a term used by Hegel indicating a statement (thesis) its opposite (antithesis) and its resolution (synthesis) which can easily become the next thesis.

Things in dialects tend to deal with mediation of opposites. Ultimately, French structuralism under Claude Levi-Strauss brings this idea to both culture and specifically folklore. From there h=it has continued to be relevant in art analysis including film. Opposites are brought into conflict in some way.

Although this form of analysis has been falling out of favor since post modernism, one can wonder whether or not artists didn’t think in those terms in those days, in the same way that Freud was very much in vogue at a certain period of time an dmany wrks had “Freudian” overtones. See Tennessee Williams and as a kind of counterpoint Alfred Hitchcock’s sort of funny psychological expressions at the end of films like Psycho, Vertigo and Marnie.

Sunrise does set up a number of opposing categories within the film (although there are some which are interesting outside it as well). For example, the story is clear from the start that it could be anywhere, but the town has to look like something and it clearly isn’t Japanese or Chinese. In fact, where would you locate it? (Europe).

Murnau was after all, a displaced German working on his first film in the US, so many of his image will bear a European stamp. In addition, he recruited a number of people for the film that he had worked with in Germany. Murnau (who co-authored Caligari, only to have it butchered by the director) would himself, in Germany, write the screenplay for Sunrise based on a story by a German writer Hermann Sudermann called “Reise nach Tilset” or “A Journey to Tilset”. There aer significant changes between the film and the book but they need not interest us here. A film should and must stand on its own and any film which requires you read the book to understand the film is a BAD film. For those interested in screen writing, it is often informative to see how books, short stories and plays are adapted for the screen.

Visually notice the village, the amusement park, the city and see if you can place what part of the world they are in. The signs are in English, but…….

Part of expressionism is that the film is not realistic looking. Many Americans find this annoying. Films here are to be realistic. The Terminator must really look like he is changing form. Expressionism is not like that. It forces perspective in some instances. Watch for the scene in the film where the City woman enters the house in which the background recedes enormously.

In acting watch for the peculiar movements – especially of “The Man” (George O’Brien) who wore weights in his shoes in several of the scenes to give him anunnatural gait. What other movie does is gait remind you of?

Murnau however is also something of a romantic with an emphasis on nature (especially as it opposes culture and the city). This is very obvious in this film. In fact it is one of the common oppositions seen in the film nature/culture; country/city. Watch for others. What ones can you spot?

Sound/Silent
Light/Dark (day/night)
City/country
Stasis/movement
Land/water (fear death by drowning)
Madonna/whore
Objective/subjective
Poetry/narrative
Painting/cinema
Classical modernist
Viewer/viewed (reflexivity)

AFTER THE FILM

The film, like many early films has titles and intertitles, the first occur at the start of the film while the second are indicators of what the characters say. In several instances in the film the same title occurs before and after a scene which happens in the past but is being referred to in the present. Hence comments about how happy the Man and Woman were at first appear as intertitles. Then we see the “happy couple” in earlier times and the we see the intertitles appear again. The same occurs when the two women talk about the money lenders stripping the farm of its assets,

Sound/Silent
No synchronous sound, but there are crowd noises and sound effects of trains and horns of automobiles.
The musical score quotes from some previously composed music including Les Preludes by Liszt and the Siegfried Idyll by Wagner. The first is a bucolic piece of music and takes it name from a poem that asks “What is our life but a series of preludes” The preludes are really to a life which is to come and is discussed as a piece of music whose first solemn note is death. Hence it deals with life and its relationship to a new life. Wagner’s piece was written as a present to his wife and had the musicians lined up on the stairway to their bedroom and in the morning he had them play it as his wife awoke.
The orchestra is often related to the images which may in fact be “seen” on the screen as the imaginings of the people in the film When the City Woman talks to the Man about the city, we see what they are imaging and here some raucous music which the City Woman dances to almost in a frenzy.
The orchestra sometimes mimics the human voice. The horn which is used when the Man calls for the Woman is especially interesting since the idea is to make the story universal. If the Man had actually been audible, there would have had to have been an actual name he called, rather than remaining “universally anonymous”.

Movement
(camera)
There are several tracking shots that are famous in this film – one when the City Woman walks to the Man’s house and the camera follows her path and the other when the Man walks in the marshes to meet the City Woman. His peculiar gait (brought about by wearing heavily weighed shoes and the fact that his distance from the camera remains virtually constant gives an unusual feeling of lack of progress to the walk.
Actor's movement
O’Brien is able, because of the weighted shoes, to look peculiarly monstrous as he walks and menaces the Woman. Karloff must have studied him for Frankenstein’s monster!
There is a great deal of looking and avoidance of looking as well as bing aware of being seen and not being seen. See below.
Things:
Objects also produce motion in the film – most notably the two vehicles – the boat and the trolley ride . These are also tied to shifts ion light from dark ro light or light to dark There is complex movement in here as well as the boat is often moving very fast against the water, yet not relative to the viewer. What implications does this have?

Borders/transitions and set places
Boat dangerous attempted murder as well as the storm Movement across the lake is dangerous. Some may choose to read the lake Freudianly as having sexual implications, and hence the sexuality of the film is dangerous when movement is involved.
Trolley (travel by land) place of start of reconciliation

Light/Dark (day/night) Night – dangerous – illicit meeting, storm at sea
Day – happy earlier life.; sunrise of reconciliation
Symbols not so simple with Murnae. City is also place of bright lights, while forest is often dark and dangerous. Linking of city with night and woods with day is not so easy.

City/country not really so black and white rather shades of grey
Country /childhood
Home of the man & woman (garden of Eden)
Dangerous elements – storm, infidelity,
Boorish, peasantry (dance)

City:/adult
City woman is “devil” - drivem out of Eden at the end
Place of sophistication: many people, fancy restaurant, barber shop, amusement park etc
Place of reconciliation

Madonna/whore
Clearly there is a set up of the City woman as evil and the country one as good. This may be the clearest division in the film Despite the idea that one comes from the city, we have indicated the city is not always a bad place. It is in fact, the place of movies as indicated by theater marquee

Viewer/viewed (reflexivity)

Specularization:
Much looking through windows, performances (dance) etc. somewhat reflexive
Art mediates desire from experience per se.
City woman looks at Man through window = peeping Tom
Who stares (at whom) and who averts eyes.. (look at eyes in boat and on trolley)
Gaze of the pair at the city
Watching and identifying with watching (watching bride and groom in church and taking vows again). POWER OF SPECTATORSHIP. Get photographed after wedding. See the photographer photographing. (background is fake as in the film)
The film is somewhat reflexive and deals at one level with art (motion pictures) and life. In some sense Murnau seems to express the idea that one can learn more about life from art than from life.
Lost/found life/death death/rebirth sun(moon)rise/sun(moon)set (cyclical)

Back