Das Kabinett des Doktor Caligari (The Cabinet of Dr, Caligari)
1920

Robert Wiene, director

Before the film

Horror is a genre which is typified by:

eruption of the repressed
off screen sounds

Although it often crosses with science fiction, the latter films are generally more involved with world catastrophy than individual problems. Alfred Hitchock's Psycho is often considered a classic horror film in these respects. What kinds of sub-genres are there in horror?

Are monster movies "horror" films?
Psycho is a kind of psychological horror.
Are there are supernatural horror films? Consider films like The Exorcist. How Would you classify films such as Curse of the Demon or Cat People where there is some question as to whether the events are real or imagined?
Are the three films we are about to see similar? How similar are they? Consider the structure of the film. How is it put together? Would a different structure alter the film's meaning - that is would we read it differently?

I. Variables in film:

lighting
sound
etc.

II. Genre

Story line
tropes
specularization/scopophilia
III. Style

1. tells you something about where, when or who made the object. “In the style of the people of the Pacific” in the style of the 1800’s”, “in the style of Shakespere”.

2. Some styles are named: modernism, postmodernism, impressionism, expressionism. This last is awkward since almost all art expresses something, but in this case it is an internal state of the artist (often) that is being expressed. The result in film is that expressionist films do not look like the real world.

3. Germany in the 1920’s experimented with an expressionist style which we see in the two short films today “The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari” and “Nosferatu”. Since many German film makers fled Germany for the US shortly after this, the style has some impact on American on American film in a somewhat diluted version. Americans by and large have been growing away from this style of film making, looking for more and more reality in the films. No matter how fantastical the film, it should LOOK real. These films do not.

4. Expressionism can not use the real world to film in. All the scenes are shot in doors where directors have complete control over all aspects of the film making process.

5. Expressionism is important for films which lie outside the “real world” in some way. The are usable for fantasy, supernatural and supernatural horror and other films of that sort.

Cabinet of Caligari:

What is the effect of the style on the film?
How is the style used to aid the story?.
After the film

What is the structure of the film?

Framed: Opening scenes in the garden and at the end in the asylum frame a narrative told by one of the characters.

What is the set design for the first part of the frame? More naturalistic. Garden seems reasonably real.

After the narration begins the set design and costuming alter dramatically.What happens?
The set designs and costuming become expressionistic.
Sets become angular and distorted
Only the bedroom of the young woman has curves in it
How does expressionism work? In what ways is there distortion in the film?

Officials sit on insanely high chairs
roads go off at "crazy" angles
houses are built at weird angles and would be unlivable

Who is mad? If the scenes with the mad man in them are equally distorted who is the narrator?

In the end section (the second half of the frame story) do the sets appear naturalistic or expressionistic?

Are there times when the film appears to link Caligari and ? There are moments when both are positioned in the same way in the frame relative to others.
When goes and sits behind Dr. Caligari's desk.
When he is put in the strait jacket
Are there people in the asylum who resemble (or are) those in the enclosed narrative?

Some questions to ponder

1. Why is Francis in the mental institution?
2. How much of his story can we believe?
3. We know that Cesare is not dead, so we must question whether the murders actually took place.
4. If the murders took place is it Francis who committed them?
5. Is this why Caligari and Frances are linked so often compositionally in the fiml (when being strait jacketed, or when Francis sits behind the director's desk?)
6. Is it the director of the institute to whom the words "Du musst Caligari werden!" (You must become Caligari) are addressed? Or is it to Francis who is telling the story?

Does the film leave its surreal nature after Francis stops the narration? It does for a moment in the garden but once we are in the mental institution, the sets look suspiciously like those in the surreal middle section of the film. The cell into which Francis is thrown is obviously the same cell Caligari was put into, although the wall drawings have shifted.

What is the meaning of Caligari's last line after he realizes that Francis believes he is Caligari "Now I know how to cure him?" Does it imply that once the deception is understood it can be cured?

There has been a great deal of argument about the structure of this film. The original writers maintain that the "frame story" was added later against their wishes. Actual ecidence shows a frame story from the start. It would appear however that the original frame story is different and implies the narrator is not insane.

Back